Orthodontic services include preventive,
interceptive and corrective considerations. Therefore, orthodontic
treatment deals directly or indirectly with the following:
The general goals and primary objectives of
orthodontic treatment are as follows:
|
ITEM |
RATING AND EXPLANATION |
|
|
ACCEPTABLE |
NOT ACCEPTABLE |
|
EXAMINATION AND PERSONAL HISTORY |
Refer to section“Examination,
Diagnosis and Treatment Planning,”
and add family
history. History and clinical examination findings recorded. |
Inadequate history or clinical
examination, insufficient needed data. |
|
DIAGNOSTIC AIDS |
Adequate diagnostic aids which may
or may not include, depending on the complexity of the case:
-
Occluded
dental casts
-
Complete
intraoral or Panorex radiograghs
-
Cephalometric radiographs and analysis
-
Photographs
|
Evidence that diagnostic aids
essential to support diagnosis absent. Dental cast ground to
centric occlusion where discrepancy exists between centric
occlusion and centric relation. |
|
DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT PLAN |
-
Written
treatment plan with stated objectives of treatment.
-
Consideration of growth and development as related to and if
pertinent to the individual case.
|
Treatment plan in conflict with
diagnosis and objectives of treatment. |
|
CASE PRESENTATION (CONSULTATION) |
Consultation with patient,
parents, or guardian. |
No consultation and/or no case
presentation. |
|
EXECUTION OF TREATMENT PLAN |
Treatment plan as executed
compatible with diagnosis and treatment objectives.
-
Appliance
of choice and indications.
-
Tissue
considerations in selection of appliance design.
-
Appliance
maintenance.
-
Post-treatment records.
|
Treatment plan not compatible with
treatment objectives.
-
Poor
choices of appliance.
-
Tissue
abuse apparent.
-
Poor
management of appliance.
|
|
RETENTION AND PLANNED RECALL |
-
A retention
plan:
-
Appliance best suited to result
-
Management of appliance
2. Planned recall. |
1. Inadequate retention plan or
poorly designed retentive appliance.
2. Recall plan nonexistent or
inadequate. |
|
EVALUATION OF RESULT |
1. Patient
benefited from treatment.
2. Objectives
of treatment attained.
a. Tissue
integrity preserved.
b. Alignment,
with condyles in functional harmony with the temporomandibular
joint.
c. Functional
occlusion.
d. Dentofacial
esthetics improved.
e. Stability
of result. |
-
No apparent
benefits from treatment.
-
Irreversible changes to patient’s disadvantage.
-
Objectives
of treatment not attained.
|