All new protocols submitted for IACUC review, or those that are three years old and will continue, must be documented on the latest IACUC protocol forms found on our web site. Submissions received on outdated forms will be returned to the PI without review.
It
is the aim of the IACUC to review protocols and proposals in a
timely manner. Many of the protocols must be returned because of
housekeeping errors or over-sights, which have to do with the
procedural aspects of the protocol and not necessarily the
scientific content of the research. Listed below are common
reasons for preliminary approval instead of full approval by the
Committee. Attention to details and the elimination of simple
housekeeping errors would expedite the process and reduce the
investigators' and the Committee's time required for approval.
1. Omission Of Emergency Telephone Numbers. These are
important if the animal caretakers and veterinary staff find
animals that are ill and the principal investigator or designee
in managing these animals must make a decision. Office and lab
room numbers are not considered emergency numbers. Please provide either a home phone number, pager or cell
2. Lay Summary. Goals of the research must be clearly written to explain the purpose, scope, and significance of the research being proposed. It should be written in language that can be understood by a college graduate with no medical background. Abstracts that are submitted to scientific meetings and abstracts, which are parts of a grant proposal generally, have too much scientific jargon and assume considerable knowledge of the subject being discussed. Not all scientific disciplines are represented on the Committee and the non-faculty members of the Committee should be able to clearly understand the intent and significance of the study.
3. Justification of Animal Numbers. A common error is that the number of animals requested does not match up with the number of experiments that have been outlined. Simply asking for a specific number of animals without justifying the numbers and indicating how they are going to be used is not sufficient for the Committee. If there are a large number of animals with multiple experiments, a brief table outlining the experiments and the number of animals is extremely helpful.
4. The Administration of Drugs. When drugs are administered to awake animals, the principal investigator should indicate overt actions of the drug, whether side effects are anticipated, and the consequences of the drug actions on the animal. If the effects of the drug will alter the behavior or well being of the animal to a considerable degree, describe what changes are expected and for how long. The principal investigator should describe possible adverse reactions and outline corrective actions.
5. Clarification of Terminal Surgery as A Painful/Non-Painful Procedure. It is the USDA position that terminal surgery has the potential for pain. Thus, the USDA requires that the investigator consider alternatives to the procedure and that the IACUC review and approve the procedure. Accordingly, protocols involving terminal surgery procedures will be classified as Category B under USDA classification system (Class 2) and require full IACUC review.
6. Anesthesia and Analgesia
7. Surgery
8. Euthanizing Animals. If it is necessary to
euthanize an experimental animal, the investigator in charge of
the research, testing or teaching procedure, or a qualified
designee, shall use only methods that are approved by the
American Veterinary Medical Association Panel on Euthanasia or
approved by the IACUC. The PI must describe in the protocol the
method and indicate the signs that indicate that the animal has
been successfully euthanized.
