- Nuclear Medicine Technology Program
- Medical College of Georgia
- Instructional Format and Schedule
- Fall 2003
Overview of the Instructional Rationale:
With the exception of the few of you who are making that
mid-life run at "what I want to do when I grow up", you have all been
in school for the better portion of your lives. By this point you are
trained professionals with full understanding of what to expect in learning new
information and skills. It has gone pretty much like this:
- The Traditional "Sage
on the Stage" Format
- Me, the teacher,
"the expert":
- stands in a room and talks for 3 hours per week
- shows pictures and diagrams
- distributes supportive handouts
- answers questions
- demonstrates manipulation-dependent tasks in a laboratory
- gives tests
- gives grades
You "the student":
- sits in desks and writes notes furiously or daydreams sleepily 3 hours per
week
- looks at power point slides or diagrams and wonders if this is what needs
to be remembered for the test
- takes handouts and doodles in the margins or places in folder to look at
the night before the test
- asks "what do I need to know for the test?"--"will it be
multiple choice?"
- tries to turn the red liquid blue, or calculate to get the same answer as
my lab partner
- studies for three hours the night before the test hoping for multiple
choice format; executes/forgets
traditional outcome:
7. "I got an A" -- "S/He gave me a
D"
- The Nuclear Format: "New
Clear" Format
- Me "the facilitator":
- Provides guidance and structure for the identification of "Learning
Issues" n hours per week
- Directs discussion of patient case based on student technologists level of
experience and life's points of reference as relates to current learning
module.
- Identifies supportive resources for research of learning issues (FASE*)
and assigns student-driven collaborative projects and clinical assignments
to be conducted in clinical setting.
- Asks student questions -- poses "reflective questions" to follow
up discussions and support relevant learning
- Discusses clinical assignments and assists students in formulating
self-directed plans and questions for completing tasks within the clinical
setting.
- Evaluates learning based on many demonstrations of student learning
- A. Traditional unit tests
- B. Patient Case Studies derived from clinical
experience
- C. Collaborative projects
- D. Online discussions of
"reflective questions"
- E. Self-directed clinical laboratory
assignments
- F. Demonstration of clinical skills
-
-
- 7. Grade calculation based on
multi-factoral demonstrations of application of new knowledge and
-
competencies and personal integration to individual clinical and career
needs.
- A. Testing that demonstrates knowledge of
"why" as well as "what" in new learning.
- B. Display and identification of most
important learning issues through clinical case studies
- C. Presentation of polished research
product at designated timeline points, in collaborative
- small groups.
- D. Ongoing research and
documentation of "reflective questions" between
formal class meetings.
- E. Application of newly learned
concepts to clinical experiments and onsite projects.
- F. Evaluation of evolving clinical
performance by clinical staff, faculty, peers, and
self-assessment.
You "the learner"
- Decides what things are important information
(learning issues) that needs to be researched to accomplish specific
Nuclear Medicine tasks.
- Researches and applies the information of those
"need to know" issues to situations that surround previous
personal experiences, or new experiences within the clinical setting.
- Creates meaningful learning by participating in active
discussion, collaboration, research, and multi-media tutorials, lectures and
assignments.
- Asks clinical staff how and why specific tasks are done.
Seeks answers to follow-up questions. Looks for concrete clinical examples
of abstract classroom concepts. Looks for ah-ha information in all
aspects of current experience that will create success in future career.
- Applies abstract classroom and research learning aspects to
practical laboratory assignments conducted by personal initiative within the
clinical setting with guidance from the clinical supervisor.
- Demonstrates ability to apply new found nuclear medicine
knowledge to unknown, or unfamiliar hypothetical situations on unit tests
and final examinations. Articulates the rationale and purpose of
clinical tasks performed on real live patients to demonstrate ongoing
clinical mastery.
Nu-clear outcome:
7. "I learned to be a Nuclear Medicine
Technologist -- a SuperTech"
İMOwen 2003