Medical College of Georgia
  Radscape   |  A-Z Index  |  MCG Home    
 


Lung Mass Image 1

Lung Mass Image 2

Nuclear Medicine

 

 

 

 

 

Lung Mass Evaluation with F18FDG

Amanda Brautigan, CNMT, RT(N)
Senior Student NMT, Medical College of Georgia

 

Rufus Poole, CNMT, Chief Technologist
Emory Univeristy Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine

 

Mary Anne Owen, MHE, RT(N)
Program Director, Nuclear Medicine Technology
Medical College of Georgia

Discussion

Patient History:

59 year old white female, smoker for 30 years two packs a day…quit 6 years ago.  She has been coughing up blood with a persistent cough and difficulty breathing.  A mass appeared in her lung on CT, but she has had two negative bronchial washes. 

Findings:

With no CT available from the hospital for comparison, the exact location of the increased areas of increased uptake are unknown at the time of dictation.  What steps could be taken to prevent this shortfall in the future? There are several areas of intense focal F18 FDG uptake in the left superior mediastinum and left posterior hilum.  Standard uptake values (SUV) were calculated and reported at 4 for some areas and others were as high as 10.  These uptake values are most definitely associated with malignancy. What are the significant ranges or values for SUV?

Radiopharmacy:

10.6 mCi of F18 FDG were injected intravenously and the patient then rested quietly in a room alone for 45 minutes. Why Rest?

Procedure:

At 45 minutes the patient was asked to empty her bladder to minimize her dose and shine from the increased activity on her PET scan…and with hopes of getting a clear image of her pelvic area.  

Positioning

The patient was laid down (supine?prone?) on the table and positioned with her arms above her head for a whole body scan.  

How is the posiitoning different from SPECT imaging, if at all?

Instrumentation:

In the computer, whe was set up for 4 beds meaning the scanner would move to 4 different positions to acquire counts from her nose to below her pelvis.  This is a length sufficient to provide diagnostic information. 

The acquisition was performed with the septa out to increase the resolution and acquire as many true counts as possible.  There are upper and lower level discriminators (what does this mean?) built into the software at 250 and 650 keV to account for the 511 keV of the positron annihilation reaction and enough scatter to provide a desirable target to background ratio. 

 

Processing

How are these studies processed?

 


May 2002


 

 


Copyright 2003
Medical College of Georgia
All rights reserved.

Case Studies  |  Medical College of Georgia

Please email comments, suggestions or questions to:
Mimi Owen, mowen@mcg.edu
January 01, 2005