Phase II Home Page
The
Language of
Bioethics (Glossary)
Objective
Goals
Required
Reading
Clinical
Vignette
Discussion
Questions
Truth-Telling
(Disclosure) to
Children
Suggested
Reading
References
& Resources
|
|
Truth-Telling and the Pediatric
Patient
Helping, Hurting, or Honoring Children?
Objective
To explore the physician's
responsibility to the child as a patient when conveying information about their
health status, care plans, and prognosis. And look at truth-telling as it
pertains to informed consent in pediatrics.
Goals
- List three reasons that truth-telling by a
physician to a child might be considered "unethical" or
unnecessary. What principles support these arguments?
- List three reasons that truth-telling by a
physician to a child might be considered beneficial. What principles support
these arguments?
Required Reading
- Introduction to Clinical Ethics. Fletcher,
Miller, Lombardo, and Marshal.Second Edition.
"Capacity in Older Children and Adolescents," p 77-78.
- Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of
Pediatrics. Informed Consent,
Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics
1995;95:314-7.
Clinical Vignette
Truth in Time,
excerpted from, In the Case of Children (Baylis & McBurney, eds)
Toronto: The Hospital for Sick Children; 1993.
KG, a 16 year-old young lady was
injured in a motor vehicle accident. Both of her parents were in the car at the
time of the accident. Each of the three were transported from the scene to three
different area hospitals in different ambulances--unconscious at the time.
Unknown to the girl, her mother was pronounced dead at the scene. Her father is
in an ICU at another hospital, but is stable.
Within 36 hours of admission to the
ICU, KG is alert and out of danger. Her grasp of reality is appropriate and she
is psychologically stable enough to be confronted with the terrible news of her
mother's death, but her family insists that this information be withheld...at
least until KG is discharged from the hospital and reunited with her father. The
staff, especially some of the nurses, have spoken extensively about disclosure
of the facts to KG with the extended family, in particular an apparent
spokesperson who is KG's maternal uncle. But the uncle insisted on delaying such
disclosure.
This disturbed some of the nurses
who were being confronted with very pointed questions by KG, clearly indicating
her awareness and anxiety. Tension arose as the staff was torn between covering
up the truth to respect the family's wishes and respecting KG's need to
know--and, hence, her being spared unnecessary anxiety. In the meantime,
visiting family members were so bold as to wear mourning black! When her sister,
having been told of her mother's impending funeral, arrived from afar, she did
not even tell KG of her loss! Finally the nursing staff became insistent and
gave the uncle an ultimatum. While initially trying to get the staff to tell KG
(they refused) he finally responded...scarcely in time for KG to arrange for
someone to bring flowers to her mother's funeral as her representative.
Discussion
Questions
- Does KG have the right to the truth? Do others
(e.g. family members, health care professionals) have a duty to tell KG the
truth?
- Is it KG's "best interests" to be
told the truth? Why? Why not?
- When should family wishes be respected? Should
the nurses have insisted that KG be told the truth or respected the family's
wish?
- Who is best suited for telling? What
constitutes "best" in this sense... Efficiency? Humaneness?
Compassion? From whose perspective should this be judged, or
determined...the person being told or others?
- When is disclosure by physicians a
professional act? When might it simply be an act of mercy, thus taking the
burden off of the family?
Substitute a younger child with a
lethal diagnosis (HIV, terminal CF or cancer), for whom the parents request
nondisclosure and work through these questions.
Tell all the Truth but tell
it slant-
Success in Circuit lies
Too bright for our infirm Delight
The Truth's superb surprise
As Lightening to the Children eased
With explanation kind
The Truth must dazzle gradually
Or every man be blind-
Emily Dickenson
Truth-Telling
(Disclosure) to Children
1. Two-fold purpose of disclosure:
- To inform patients properly
- To enable motivated patients to make
informed decisions
2. Seven reasons for telling the truth
- Promotes the patient's well being
- Furthers the patient's life choices
- Emphasizes the importance of good
communication skills
- Shows respect for persons
- Prevents having to lie
- Reduces the risks of harm to patients
- Reduces the physician's liability
3. Considerations in pediatric cases
- Age and cognitive development of the
child– capacity to understand
- Assessment of "benefit" to
child–need to know, and when
- Prerogative of parents to disclose or
withhold information
- Determination of "therapeutic
privilege"– withholding truth because of expected harm
4. Role of the pediatric health care
professional–advocacy
5. Models of dealing with truth-telling to
children (see Table)
A. Protector (based on
beneficence; old model of paternalism)
B. Liberator (based on principle
of autonomy)
1. Autonomy states that the
individual:
- Knows his/her feelings best
- "Owns" his/her body and
information about it
- Cannot defend him/herself against
invasion of privacy without knowing truth
- Must bear the burden of consequences of
decisions about them, and thereby is entitled to the truth
2. Respecting the autonomy of
children presupposes that children are separate and distinct individuals,
with a just claim to rights as full moral and legal "persons."
C. Educator (based on role of
advocacy, respect of developing person, child's best interests)
| Three
Models of the Pediatric Professional's Role in Truth-Telling |
| Protector–argues
against truth-telling to children |
Liberator–the
truth respects the child's autonomy and therefore must be told |
Educator–as
an advocate, fosters autonomy & educates children in the means
necessary to become decision makers |
| It is harmful–producing
unnecessary suffering |
Not harmful–disclosure
brings child/family/professional together, sharing truth & burdens |
Prepares child in a
progressive manner for responsibilities of being an adult |
| It is useless–children
don't/can't make decisions anyway |
Not
useless–lets child be himself (they find out the truth anyway) |
Increase child's self-esteem |
| It is irresponsible–responsible
care givers (parents) should bear the burden of truth |
Not
irresponsible–make everyone face the truth & avoid deception
(including family/MDs) |
Promotes children taking more
responsibility for their life/health |
| It is impossible–children
cannot understand the facts/deliberate about difficult choices |
Not
impossible–children do understand (more than we realize?)
especially by age 7 |
Increases the child's sense of
being in control (security) |
Suggested
Reading
Note: These articles can be found through Ovid and will require an
ID and password.
- Weir
RF and Peters C. Affirming the decisions adolescents make about life and
death. Hastings Center Report 1997; 27(6):29-40.
- Ross
LF. Health care decision-making by children: Is it in their best
interest? Hastings Center Report 1997; 27(6): 41-45.
|