MCG Faculty Manual
Faculty Appointment,
Development, Promotions and Tenure Policy
PDF Files for Printing
(How to print PDF files)
|
|
1.0 EMERITUS APPOINTMENT CRITERIA 1.1 Positions Eligible for Consideration
At the time of their retirement from the Medical College of Georgia members of the
Corps of Instruction in the following categories shall be considered eligible for emeritus
appointment: tenured professor, associate professor, or assistant professor, or
Board-approved non-tenure track faculty of equivalent rank. Additionally, Board-approved
administrative officers may be considered.
1.2 Length of Service Criterion
Board of Regents policy requires a minimum of ten years of continuous full-time service
(not equivalent) as a faculty member in the University System in order to be considered
eligible for emeritus status.
1.3 Distinguished Service Criteria
The following criteria for recommendation for emeritus status shall be used in the
determination of eligible Corps of Instruction candidates. Documentation of consistent and
continuing achievement at the Medical College of Georgia will be required for
consideration. Successful candidates must meet at least one of these criteria.
1.3.1 Teaching
DOCUMENTATION OF CONSISTENT AND CONTINUING DEDICATION TO MANAGEMENT OF LEARNING IN THE
RESEARCH, ACADEMIC, DIDACTIC AND CLINICAL SETTINGS SHALL BE USED TO JUSTIFY EXCELLENCE IN
TEACHING. Examples may include but are not restricted to:
- Citations of professional growth and development as a teacher including but not limited
to advanced degrees obtained since appointment; publications that show evidence of
teaching effectiveness, such as textbooks, chapters in books, review papers, position
papers, or editorials; and appointment to state, regional or national boards, or
accreditation site visit teams.
- Citations of teaching load, including but not limited to number of courses taught; level
of responsibility in course development, management, evaluation, and revision; development
of teaching materials or aids; and the number and level of students and fellows directed.
- Citations of the effectiveness of teaching/learning activities, including but not
limited to teaching awards; performance of students on external examinations and/or
evaluations; and development of teaching protocols and aids that have been adopted by
other institutions. The primary focus shall be upon the demonstrated quality of teaching
as evidenced by teaching effectiveness.
1.3.2 Scholarship
DOCUMENTATION OF CONSISTENT AND CONTINUING RESEARCH/SCHOLARLY
ACHIEVEMENT SHOULD INCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ORIGINAL RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP LEADING TO
SIGNIFICANT ADVANCES IN THE DISCIPLINE AND TO PUBLICATIONS IN REFEREED JOURNALS,
TEXTBOOKS, OR CHAPTERS IN BOOKS.
Seniority of authorship or degree of participation/contribution should be included in
any consideration of achievement. Scholarly recognition is also reflected in the type,
level, and extent of extramural grant support, as well as by awards and citations of merit
in the recognition of contributions to the field or discipline. Evidence of professional
growth and development as a scholar may include but shall not be limited to appointment to
review panels, to project review site visit teams, to committees or officership of
academic societies, or to journal editorial boards, and consultantship to research
institutions and agencies. The quality and significance of scholarship and research shall
be supported by written evaluations by outside recognized experts in the field.
1.3.3 Service
DOCUMENTATION OF CONSISTENT AND CONTINUING SERVICE SHOULD INCLUDE TWO
ELEMENTS: SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC AND SERVICE TO THE INSTITUTION. (Service commitments
should be beyond institutional committee service.)
- Service to the Public: As the health sciences university of the State of Georgia,
the principal public service activity of the faculty should be in health care delivery,
disease prevention, health promotion, and health education. However, other forms and types
of public service should not be excluded, if germane to the mission and purpose of the
institution, school and discipline in which the faculty member holds appointment.
Demonstrated quality of service should include the level of activity, such as numbers and
types of patients served and the number of students, house officers and fellows supervised
in patient evaluation and health care delivery. Evidence of professional development could
include publications, certifications, licensures, boards, and citations of merit as well
as evidence of special expertise such as intramural and extramural consultantships, and
the development of innovative approaches to health care delivery, disease prevention,
health promotion, and health education.
- Service to the Institution: As members of the corps of instruction of the Medical
College of Georgia, faculty are expected to be participants in the collegial functions of
higher education. These include, but are not limited to participation in departmental,
school, and institutional faculty governing bodies; service on departmental, school, and
institutional academic committees, including those concerned with student recruitment,
admissions, and counseling; the development of and/or participation as a teacher in
continuing education programs; and service on governmental and agency boards and
commissions.
Competence in all three areas with outstanding achievement in one of the three areas
in expected.
1.4 Protocol
Recommendations of eligible candidates for emeritus status may be
initiated by the immediate supervisor or the department head of the Dean 90 days prior to
date of retirement. A letter of recommendation should include a brief summary of
distinguished service criteria for the faculty member and should be submitted with a
completed Regents form for Emeritus Appointments. Candidates may apply directly to the
Dean, who then may appoint an appropriate peer review committee. Administrative Officers
may be reviewed by a committee appointed by the President. All recommendations shall be
made to the President through the appropriate dean or vice president. Eligible candidates
reporting directly to the President may be recommended to the Board of Regents by the
President. The privileges and/or duties of emeritus status are recommended by the Chairman
to the Dean for submission to the President for approval.
Approved by the Faculty
Appointment, Development, Promotion and Tenure Committee
October 25, 1991
Approved as amended by the Executive Committee
November 5, 1991
Approved by Academic Council
December 12, 1991
Approved by the President
May 24, 1993 |